home |  electronics |  toolbox |  science club |  tuxtalk |  photos |  e-cards |  online-shop



June 2024

Do smoke alarms really expire after 10 years?

Kidde smoke alarms sold in Canada have an expiration date printed onto the side of the case. Smoke alarms by First Alert sold in the same store don't have that. First Alert suggests to note down the installation date and replace it 10 years later.
A google search finds the following reasons why smoke detectors have a maximum life time of 10 years:


What's going on here? Is there really a technical reason for this fixed expiration time or is this just fear based marketing? The first bullet point seems quite logical but the problem is that americium-241 has a half life of 432 years. 10 years is nothing compared to 432 years so that's obviously misleading nonsense.

How does a smoke detector work?

There are two type of smoke detectors. One is called photoelectric smoke detector and the other one is an ionization chamber smoke detector. Ionization chamber smoke detectors are the older type. They contain a quite dangerous man made radio active element known as americium-241. It's an element that does not exist naturally and it's a strong alpha-emitter. The americium-241 isotope is made from plutonium-239. Alpha radiation does not get very far but it can cause enormous damage if it hits a living cell. Americium-241 emits also gamma rays, a kind of invisible light that is very hard to shield. Americium-241 is extremely dangerous if ingested or inhaled. It's not a good idea to throw americium-241 into landfills where it could one day show up in the ground water. It's not a good idea to throw it into a trash incinerator either because americium-241 vapors are equally dangerous. In many places it is however allowed and even recommended to just throw the americium-241 detectors every 10 years into the household garbage.

The photoelectric smoke detectors are very easy to understand. It's basically a light beam shining into a dark chamber. If the air is clear and clean then the beam is invisible. If dust or smoke is in the air then the light beam become visible and a detector can see it.

Ionization chamber smoke detectors ionize the air in a small chamber by bombarding it with alpha radiation. This makes the air electrically conductive. Two metal plates with a voltage across will allow current to flow. If smoke get's into this air gap then less air molecules will be ionized since the smoke particles which are rather large compared to air molecules will absorb most of the alpha radiation. The detector electronics will register a drop current flow between the metal plates and the alarm will go off.

principle of an ionization chamber, source stanford university, http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2011/ph241/eason1/
principle of an ionization chamber, source: http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2011/ph241/eason1/

Let's look at some failure scenarios to understand why there could be a 10 year lifetime:

Ionization chamber smoke detectors:
These failure scenarios are safe failures cases because they will actually cause an alarm and alert you to the problem. You would clean or replace the alarm. The only scenario that could cause a silent failure is some sort of leak current between the plates. That is: current could flow between the plates without going via the ionized air. High humidity could e.g do that. Ionization chamber smoke detectors are therefore not ideal for tropical climates or humid basements. Humidity is however nothing that would accumulate over time and therefore justify an expiration time.

Photoelectric detectors:
The photoelectric detector has some age related failure scenarios but nothing happens exactly after 10 years. Any of those age related failures could happen after 5 years or only after 20 years.

Smoke alarm testing

Manufactures have built a test button into the alarm and they tell you to press it in order to test the smoke detector. What can such a button actually test? It will test the horn and maybe parts of the electronics. It can never test the actual sensor (aka smoke detector). This button does not simulate real smoke.

The only way to actually test a smoke alarm is to use real smoke. Here is how to do such a test:

Smoke alarm maintenance

While investigating the "smoke alarm expiration mystery" I came across a number of articles that recommend regular cleaning of the alarm with a vacuum cleaner.

A normal household vacuum cleaner can't clean the photoelectric chamber or the ionization chamber. It removes dust from the outside. Some people have done a tear-down of the smoke alarm and you can see how difficult it would be for a vacuum cleaner to get any dirt out of the ionization chamber:


The openings on the side of alarm are a only few millimeter wide and the detection chamber is has again small openings and is further inside the case of the alarm. To clean the alarm you need to blow compressed air towards the detection chamber. A normal vacuum cleaner will just remove cob webs on the outside.

The expiration mystery

There is no reason why a smoke alarm can not last a life time except maybe for those models that have a built-in battery that can not be changed. The 10 year expiration is totally arbitrary. It's to ensure a constant flow a income for the manufacturer and they have lobbied governments to publish nonsense guidelines in the name of safety. Fear and safety provide a good business model. How much dust and dirt accumulates has nothing to do with those 10 years. It's totally dependent on the environment around the alarm. It could already malfunction after a few years or it could last much longer. Cleaning of the alarm with compressed air and then testing it with real smoke can ensure that it actually works.

There is no reason why a fire alarm that is maintained and kept clean needs to be replaced after a specific number of years. I have a fire alarm that is fully functional and exactly as sensitive as on the first day but it's already 15 years old.

How radio active are ionization smoke alarms?

Guidelines for those alarms claim that the americium-241 isotope is well encased and shielded inside the alarm. Outside radiation is supposed to be undetectable compared to background radiation. Is that really true?
The ionization chamber has openings on the side and the top of the chamber is made of solid shield metal about 0.5mm thick. This chamber sits inside the bigger plastic case of the smoke alarm.

The inside of a smoke alarm with an ionzation chamber. The big metal dome is the ionzation chamber with the radio active isotope inside
The inside of a smoke alarm with an ionzation chamber. The big metal dome is the ionzation chamber. Source: https://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/Smoke+Detector+Teardown/23037

The americium-241 is mounted on top of a bit of lead and under a gold foil beaming up towards the top of the chamber. Here are some measurements that I did with my Geiger counter. Right outside the smoke alarm I measure levels that are way higher than background.


The ionization chamber is not the open area visible from the front. It sits below the area where the pencil cross is. Don't touch this area of the smoke alarm. There is a strong beam of gamma-rays coming out in this area.
location of the ionzation chamber
location of the ionzation chamber on this Kidde smoke alarm


Measuring background radiation levels. It's generally around 20 CPM in my area (0.12 uSv/h, the conversion factor for this Geiger tube is uSv/h = CPM * 0.0066). The counter shows here 24. That's in the normal range of fluctuation but it could also be that it's a bit higher because I had the smoke alarm just besides the table.

background radiation level: 24 CPM or 0.16 micro Sivert per hour
background radiation level: 24 CPM or 0.16 micro Sivert per hour (the counter display is missing the "/h = per hour" for display size reasons)


My Geiger counter can not measure alpha-radiation. It measures only the gamma-rays coming out of the smoke alarm. Kidde managed somehow to make the gamma-ray beam directional. No gamma-rays are detected on the side of the alarm.
 No gamma-rays are detected on the side of the alarm
No gamma-rays are detected on the side of the alarm


There is a strong beam of gamma-rays coming out of front of the smoke alarm. Gamma-rays are like an invisible light and this "light" is coming in a cone shaped beam right through the plastic front of the smoke alarm. 77 CPM or 0.5 micro Sivert per hour. About 4 times the background radiation level.
gamma-rays: 77 CPM or 0.5 micro Sivert per hour
gamma-rays: 77 CPM or 0.5 micro Sivert per hour


Gamma-rays are very powerful ionizing radiation and they penetrate everything. I am putting a 0.5mm steel sheet on top of the alarm to see how much it shields the radiation.
Using a piece of sheet metal as a shield
Using a piece of sheet metal as a shield


A 0.5mm steel sheet is unable to shied the gamma-rays, still 65 CPM or 0.43 micro sivert per hour:
still 65 CPM or 0.43 micro sivert per hour
a 0.5mm steel sheet is unable to shied the gamma-rays, still 65 CPM or 0.43 micro sivert per hour


Let's try a stronger shield: I am using here a 3/4 inch block of solid carbon steel.
Shielding with a 3/4 inch block of carbon steel
Shielding with a 3/4 inch block of carbon steel


The 3/4 inch block of solid carbon steel is able to shield the gamma rays. The radiation level is now near background:
Radation levels back to normal after shielding with a 3/4 inch block of carbon steel
Radation levels back to normal after shielding with a 3/4 inch block of carbon steel


Let's see how focused the beam of gamma rays is that comes out of the smoke alarm. Let's measure at a distance of 6 inch:
Measuring the gamma rays at a distance of 6 inch
Measuring the gamma rays at a distance of 6 inch


The beam of gamma rays must have a slight cone shape because the intensity is about 55% diluted at a distance of 6 inch from the smoke alarm.
The intensity of the gamma rays beam is about 55% diluted at a distance of 6 inch
The intensity of the gamma rays beam is about 55% diluted at a distance of 6 inch

Conclusion

The expiration time on the smoke alarms is a scam. Only regular maintenance and cleaning with compressed air can ensure that it really works. If you check it and clean it then it will last much longer than 10 years (or it might fail much earlier if you got a lemon). I would avoid smoke alarms with a built-in 10year battery because those have to be replaced when the battery runs out.

Americium-241 is a quite dangerous man made isotope that can contaminate the environment and millions of smoke alarms end up every year in landfills. Americium-241 has a half life of 432 years.

Keep a physical distance to smoke alarms with ionization technology. I would not install them in a room where you spend a lot of time. It may be OK in the staircase or the corridor where you are just passing by. This is to limit the radiation exposure time. Install it such that you will under normal circumstances not get closer to it than 3 feet. To be less than 1 foot away from the alarm for longer periods of time is in my opinion unsafe.

Most of the radio active radiation in living spaces comes from Radon gas. Dosimeter readings above 6 uSv/h due to Radon gas are considered unsafe for prolonged habitation. The radiation coming out of the smoke detector is a factor 14 smaller but it's not because of Radon gas. The smoke detector emits gamma rays and I don't know what dosimeter limits should be applied to gamma rays.



Back to NPA blog index

© 2004-2024 Guido Socher